Software Developer has an article,
Ghosts in the Machine: 12 Coding Languages that Never Took Off that spotlights twelve of many thousands of languages that never made it big. Some had potential, others were doomed to begin with.
ColdFusion makes the list. So do Haskell, Delphi, and PowerBuilder.
I don't know that I disagree with the assessment based on the thought that "the vast majority of us all use the same dozen or so."
What do you think of the list? I was surprised to see those four languages included with some of the others, but at the same time you still have to ask, have they made it? And if they did make it, are they still there?
(via
Venkat)
Hey! Why don't you make your life easier and subscribe to the full post
or short blurb RSS feed? I'm so confident you'll love my smelly pasta plate
wisdom that I'm offering a no-strings-attached, lifetime money back guarantee!
Leave a comment
Oh no! Let the outrage begin!
Posted by
Jason Holden
on Jul 13, 2007 at 10:45 AM UTC - 5 hrs
This is a blatant attempt to try and piggyback on the outrage caused by the computer world article claiming the same thing about CF a couple of months ago.
i'm sure they probably saw the traffic and exposure it must have generated and thought "hey we want some of that".
Posted by Ciqala Burt
on Jul 13, 2007 at 10:57 AM UTC - 5 hrs
Jason- I know!
Ciqala - You know, that's a good idea. I generally give them the benefit of the doubt, but it could see that as feasible.
Of course, they are far from saying CF is dead - I took it as saying it wasn't a mainstream language. I don't know that I'd call it a mainstream language either, but I certainly love to use it!
Posted by
Sam
on Jul 13, 2007 at 12:08 PM UTC - 5 hrs
The problem I have with the "mainstream" idea is that they don't even say that until the conclusion. The introduction and stated purpose of the article is to discuss why these languages:
"never took off, and the reasons they didn't."
I think this is not accurate. ColdFusion is taking off. It has been taking off for a long time. The government loves it. The Fortune 100 companies love it. And now, Adobe loves it.
I do agree with their statement that if there are drawbacks to CF it's that they are not language related... people do not get the word out as much as possible; this is something that was even brought up to Adobe at CFUNITED.
Posted by
Ben Nadel
on Jul 13, 2007 at 12:40 PM UTC - 5 hrs
Ben - you make a good point. It is easy to overlook all of the behind-the-scenes intranet applications using CF, and the developers who wrote them - almost by definition since you never see them!
Posted by
Sam
on Jul 13, 2007 at 02:05 PM UTC - 5 hrs
Heh, well I'm a ColdFusion developer and my partner is a Delphi programmer and between us we're doing quite nicely out of it. I don't think whether a language has "taken off" by an arbitrary set of factors really matters, in the overall scheme of things. Is it filling a market requirement? Are people using it? Is there demand for people with skills in it? Is there a future for the product?
For both ColdFusion and Delphi the answer is yes... so we're happy to keep developing in our languages of choice.
Posted by
Kay Smoljak
on Jul 14, 2007 at 01:23 AM UTC - 5 hrs
Kay - certainly! My company (and plenty of others!) does quite well with CF. Plenty of programmers make a good living in it!
I don't think it matters much either, except to say in some cases, "look at the potential we have/had" and "could we capitalize better on it?"
I didn't take away that the article was trying denigrate the languages, but to introduce some languages that you might not be aware of (even some quite useless ones) and also to give some opinions on a couple of more well-known ones that the author felt had fallen out of favor.
I wonder why Smalltalk was not on there? I certainly expected it to be!
Posted by
Sam
on Jul 14, 2007 at 07:42 AM UTC - 5 hrs
Leave a comment